To misquote Mao Zedong, creating a single currency is not a tea party. Despite former U.S. central banker Alan Greenspan's disparaging comments about the future of the euro, Americans had far worse problems creating a single currency.
The question facing the Europeans as they hammer out a deal with Greece is whether the long-term advantages of the euro outweigh the pain of the current ructions. If the American experience is any guide, it is worth it.
Greenspan has been widely quoted as predicting the collapse of the eurozone, led by the forced exit of Greece. In the interview on the BBC, however, Greenspan did not specifically link the two, as in cause and effect.
But he did say that, in the long term, the European currency union is untenable.
"There is no way I can conceive of the euro continuing unless and until all of the members of the eurozone become politically integrated," Greenspan told the BBC's Mark Mardell.
What Greenspan conveniently seemed to forget is that for Americans (and even Canadians), settling on a single unit of payment was a long and painful process. It costs money. And if U.S. history is any guide, it does not depend on perfect political integration.
Remember the Texas redback
In some ways, the U.S. states are less integrated than the countries of the European Union. Certainly they were much less so when they were getting their currency together.
Above, a Texas redback three-dollar bill. Texas only joined the U.S. currency union after the federal government paid the state's $10-million debt. At the time, the entire U.S. federal debt was about $50 million. (Treasurer of the Republic of Texas/Wikimedia Commons)
Texas, as just one example, only joined the currency union in 1850 after the Texas redback collapsed. The bankrupt state was bailed out to the tune of $10 million as part of the Compromise of 1850.
The size of that bailout comes into proportion when you know that in 1853 the entire U.S. federal debt was about $50 million.
Then, of course, there was the U.S. Civil War, with its Confederate States of America dollar. Even the Union dollar collapsed. That was when the name "greenback" appeared because the currency was no longer backed by gold. In 1862, the U.S. dollar fell in value to 38 Canadian cents.
Even after the U.S. Supreme Court declared Washington to be sovereign over the individual states, it was privately owned banks that issued currency. Central banking was an innovation imported from Europe only after the U.S. financial collapse of 1907.
Disparities across Canada
As Mark Carney observed in one of his last speeches as governor of the Bank of Canada, titled Canada Works, many of the disparities between countries in the eurozone exist in Canada as well. Differences in labour and living costs in different parts of Canada mean the effective exchange rate changes from province to province.
"Although there is one exchange rate for Canada as a whole (we all use Canadian dollars), price differentials across the country yield different real provincial exchange rates," said Carney.
Carney said that the same thing is happening within the eurozone and within Canada. In some cases "intra-regional exchange rates" have been more volatile in Canada.
"Since the euro was introduced, Spanish competitiveness has fallen by about 30 per cent relative to Germany," said Carney. "During the same period, the Alberta exchange rate moved even more dramatically, rising 40 per cent relative to Quebec."
In Canada, free movement of labour and transfers of money from richer to poorer provinces help to smooth the differences. On paper, many of those conditions exist in the EU as well.
But creating a currency union is not done just on paper. And it is not without its costs. Canada paid the debt of Newfoundland to bring it into Confederation, just as the U.S. bailed out Texas. That is how all currency unions are made. As U.S. history shows, currency unions are always political.
In the case of the eurozone, Greenspan said that's not good enough.
"Fundamentally, what clearly was the driving force was the fact that they had two world wars on European soil within 20, 25 years," he said dismissively.
I don't know about Greenspan, but I'd say avoiding a third world war is worth a bit of trouble getting through the current rough patch.
Anda sedang membaca artikel tentang
Keeping Greece in the eurozone is worth the pain: Don Pittis
Dengan url
http://belajarbisnismen.blogspot.com/2015/02/keeping-greece-in-eurozone-is-worth.html
Anda boleh menyebar luaskannya atau mengcopy paste-nya
Keeping Greece in the eurozone is worth the pain: Don Pittis
namun jangan lupa untuk meletakkan link
Keeping Greece in the eurozone is worth the pain: Don Pittis
sebagai sumbernya
0 komentar:
Posting Komentar